Home > National News and Information
       
 
  National News & Information
  About Fish & Game NZ
What does Fish & Game do?
Fish & Game Position Statements
Control of Bird Populations
Factsheet
Fish and Game Licences
RMA
Riverbank Management
Didymo
Game Bird Stamps
  Fish & Game Media Releases
   
  Northland   Nelson/Marlborough
  Auckland/Waikato   West Coast
  Eastern   North Canterbury
  Hawke's Bay   Central South Island
  Taranaki   Otago
  Wellington   Southland
       
   
 

Click to obtain or update your licence or find our more about Fishing and Hunting licences.

Get licences here
Fishing licence FAQ
Otago Greenstone Booking system
Back country licences
Didymo Controls for Fiordland 

   
  Signup for our newsletters and ensure you're always up-to-date
  Signup here
   
 
About Fish & Game NZ
Contact Us
Fish & Game Internal
     Copyright © 2007  -  Fish & Game NZ
National news & Information

National News> Media Releases

31 May 2006

REPORT GIVES FALSE COMFORT

Fish & Game New Zealand question the results of a progress report released today outlining the results from the second year of the Dairying and Clean Streams Accord.

The report applauds progress against the targets set in 2003, but does not demonstrate significant progress in actual on-farm practises. “To suggest that a 1% increase from 2003/04 to 2004/05 in bridging farm race stream crossing points is significant progress, is stretching the reality. Again, 17% of farms employed nutrient budgets in 2003/04 and the report notes only a 2% increase to 19% for 2004/05; hardly ‘significant progress,’ “ said Bryce Johnson, Director Fish & Game New Zealand

“I think that report does accurately highlight three facts that Fish & Game have been advocating for some time. Firstly, that many farmers are taking measures to protect and enhance the nation’s freshwater resource. This core group has been working with, or towards sustainable practices before the Dairying and Clean Streams Accord was initiated, and they deserve acknowledgment for this.

“Secondly, the targets set in 2003 Accord are far too soft – many of these standards (such as stock excluded from 50% of waterways) would have already been met by that core of environmentally responsible farmers. Achieving soft targets, and reporting on existing performance in excess of ‘targets’ does not demonstrate significant progress.

Thirdly, the real rate of progress in changing the approach of the balance of farmers whose practises continue to degrade our finite waterways is very disappointing. Independently of targets and already established healthy practices, there is very little increase in the number of farms using nutrient budgets, excluding stock from streams, protecting stock crossing points or management of dairy effluent.

The report gives false comfort to those unwilling to take responsibility for adverse environmental affects; the good news is not “news” at all, but is the result of a core group of farmers having long established sustainable practices. The report enables the environmentally careless to ride on the backs of those put in the effort to pass on a healthy environment to the next generation.”

For more information:

Bryce Johnson

Director Fish & Game New Zealand

021 397 897

MoST Content Management V3.0.3127